A business owner preparing to sell hands over a set of accounts showing $620,000 in net profit for the year. Three weeks later, the buyer’s advisers return with a recalculated figure of $540,000. The multiple gets applied to that second number, not the first, and the gap between them was never explained by anyone until the offer landed on the table.
This is not sloppy accounting, and it is not an attempt by either side to mislead the other. It is the ordinary distance between profit as reported for internal purposes or the ATO, and earnings as reconstructed for a sale, a process usually called normalisation or a quality of earnings review. Every cost an owner assumes will be added back gets tested. Every cost a buyer insists on adding back in shifts the base the multiple gets applied to, before any negotiation on the multiple itself even starts.
Most owner-led businesses only encounter this properly once, in the weeks after a letter of intent arrives. By then there is no time to fix what the number reveals. Understanding how the adjustment works well before a sale process begins is one of the more useful things an owner can do with a quiet financial year.
What Normalised Earnings Actually Measures
Reported profit reflects how the business was actually run under its current owner, discretionary decisions included. Normalised earnings strips out the one-off and owner-specific effects to estimate what the business would earn under new ownership, run on an arm’s length basis. The two numbers can be close. On many owner-led businesses across Queensland and the East Coast, they are not, because owner-led businesses tend to carry more discretionary and related-party items than corporate-owned ones.
The distinction matters because the multiple is only ever as reliable as the base it is applied to. A five times multiple on an inflated earnings figure produces a purchase price that does not survive due diligence. A buyer who cannot trust the earnings base will either walk away from the process or drop the multiple further to compensate for the uncertainty, which costs the seller more than the individual add-back disputes would have.
The Add-Backs Buyers Generally Accept
Genuinely one-off items tend to survive scrutiny when they are documented and clearly non-recurring across the last two to three financial years. A legal dispute settled once, a redundancy cost tied to a specific restructuring event, an insurance claim shortfall, or a discrete consulting project that will not repeat all fall into this category. The pattern buyers look for is a cost that appears once in the financial history and has a clear, isolated cause. Where the same category of cost shows up in more than one of the last three years, buyers start treating it as part of normal operating life rather than a genuine exception, regardless of how it is labelled in the accounts.
The Add-Backs Buyers Push Back On
Related-party rent paid above or below the market rate gets adjusted to market either way, since a new owner will pay whatever the market actually charges. Family salaries that sit above or below the value of the work performed get the same treatment. Discretionary bonuses paid every year regardless of the label attached to them are treated as ordinary remuneration, not a one-off event, because a buyer has to assume the pattern continues. None of this reflects badly on how the business has been run. It reflects the difference between decisions that made sense for a private, owner-led structure and the arm’s length basis a buyer has to price the business on.
The Owner’s Salary Line Most People Get Backwards
The adjustment that catches owners most often is their own remuneration, and it frequently cuts the wrong way. Many owner-led businesses pay the owner below the true market value of the role they perform, particularly in the early growth years when cash was tight. A buyer does not view this as extra profit available to a new owner. They view it as a cost that has been understated, and they impute a market-rate replacement salary as a deduction from earnings before applying the multiple. An owner expecting this line to add profit back in is often surprised to see it work in the opposite direction, reducing the very number the sale price is built from.
The businesses that come through this process with the least friction are the ones that have already done the reconciliation before a buyer asks for it. An Indicative Business Valuation builds a normalised earnings figure using the same logic a buyer applies, so the gap between reported profit and defensible earnings is known in advance rather than discovered mid negotiation. Where a sale is genuinely on the horizon, a Vendor Due Diligence Pack goes further, documenting every adjustment with the paper trail a buyer’s advisers will ask for, which materially reduces the friction and the price erosion that shows up when normalisation is left until the buyer does it unilaterally.
The financial year that just closed is a reasonable place to start, whether or not a sale is imminent. Knowing which of your own add-backs would survive a buyer’s scrutiny, and which cost line is currently understating what a new owner would actually have to pay, is worth more before the process starts than during it. Book a discovery call with ProfitPulse to work through where your numbers currently sit.
Frequently asked questions
What does normalised EBITDA mean when selling a business in Australia?
Normalised EBITDA is the earnings figure a buyer arrives at after adjusting reported profit for one-off costs, owner-specific decisions, and related-party arrangements that would not carry over to a new owner. It is the number a sale multiple actually gets applied to, rather than the profit figure shown on management accounts or tax returns. An Indicative Business Valuation builds this figure using the same approach a buyer’s advisers would use.
Why does a buyer add back the owner’s salary as a cost instead of profit?
When an owner has been paid below the market value of the role they perform, a buyer treats the gap as an understated cost rather than extra profit, because a new owner will need to hire someone at a market rate to do that job. This adjustment reduces earnings rather than increasing them, which surprises many owners expecting the opposite outcome from the review.
What one-off costs can be added back to profit before a business sale?
Costs with a clear, isolated cause that has not repeated across the last two to three financial years generally survive scrutiny: a single legal dispute, a redundancy tied to a specific restructuring event, an insurance claim shortfall, or a discrete consulting project. Where a similar cost appears in more than one recent year, buyers tend to treat it as ordinary operating life rather than a genuine exception.
How does related-party rent affect a business valuation at sale?
Rent paid to a related party above or below the market rate gets adjusted back to market value, in either direction, because a new owner will pay whatever the market actually charges for the premises. This is one of the more common quality of earnings adjustments in owner-led businesses across Queensland and the wider East Coast, and it is usually straightforward to document once identified.
How do I prepare my financials before a buyer reviews my business?
Start by reconstructing the last two to three years of accounts on a normalised basis using the same adjustments a buyer’s team would apply, so there are no surprises when due diligence begins. A Vendor Due Diligence Pack documents each adjustment with the supporting paper trail buyers ask for, which reduces both the friction and the price erosion that comes from disputed add-backs discovered mid negotiation.
Do discretionary bonuses count as normal costs when valuing a business?
If a bonus has been paid in some form every year regardless of the label attached to it, buyers treat it as ordinary remuneration rather than a genuine one-off, because they have to assume the pattern continues under new ownership. Only bonuses tied to a specific, non-recurring event are usually accepted as an add-back.
When should an Australian SME owner start preparing for a quality of earnings review?
Two to three financial years before an intended sale gives enough time for adjustments to show consistently in the accounts rather than appearing as a late, convenient change. The financial year just closed is a practical starting point for most owner-led businesses, since a full year of clean data is available and the FY27 planning window is still open.
Leave a Reply